· Treatment in a respectful manner that is required for human dignity (article 1)
· No discrimination (article 5)
· Meeting with lawyers “without observing from anybody” (article 18)
· Meeting especially with family members and communication with outside world (article 19)
· Staying in a reasonable prison regarding with its residence province (article 20)
· Informed about the actions that cause discipline punishment, listened (oral defence) before being punished (article 30)
· Demand for investigation by first hand of prison’s conditions and treatments that he/she is subjected (article 33).
One person prison that is different practice from other arrested and sentenced persons, 20 days cell punishment, which is against article 5 bans discrimination, article 19 states meeting with his/her lawyers-family members, article 20 on staying in a reasonable prison and especially against entirely article 1, depending on arguments, which are indefinite, open to point of view (comment), difficult to examine result in making isolation conditions more difficult.
It is apparently that “cell punishment” does not have any meaning other, in one person prison practice, except for causing new tensions and pressures.
Discipline punishment should be drawn immediately and “isolation” practice should be completely destructed.
HUMAN RIGHTS ASSOCIATION